aki Urdangarin lawyer accused in a letter to the trial judge Palma Arena violate his right to defend the "value judgments" issued in a car in which held, inter alia, that the Duke "Was always behind the corporate network" investigated for alleged embezzlement.
In the opinion of counsel for the Duke of Palma, Mario Pascual Vives, Judge Jose Castro issued "in haste a pre-judgment" against his client statements in this car with him were a "clear helplessness," which the court denied in a resolution in response to your letter.
The lawyer asked in a letter dated last Tuesday a number of clarifications on a judge's order on 13 in which he asserted that statements attributed to Urdangarin placed as "Rector" of the group of companies linked to the Institute Nos and added that "does not quite convince" his explanation that his work was limited to sporting issues.
According to counsel, Castro made a series of "claims" and "value judgments" in the car that involve "a violation of the rights of defense and effective judicial protection" of Urdangarin.
The defense believes the judge made "statements of special roundness"
"Everything leads us to think," said Pascual Vives, that the judge "issued in haste a pre-trial" to collect on the judgment "claims and assertions with special range emphatically," and then cited a number of them.
Specifically, Castro referred to the statement that "there is every indication" that Urdangarin not split with the activities related to the Institute Nos after leaving office in 2006 on the recommendation of the Royal House.
The instructor also cites the testimony of Urdangarin question following "numerous witnesses" who testified to police that "he was always behind all the corporate network," which according to the judge also said several suspects in court and in his opinion, "is supported by numerous documents seized."
For the lawyer Urdangarin with these claims Castro "violates the right to defense" of the Duke of Palma, and that does not specify which witnesses, defendants and documents are concerned.
The judge believes that it has not caused any defenseless
Pascual Vives notes that the judge made these statements in the current "incipient phase of instruction" and stresses that produce a "clear helplessness" and have the "Clearly intended to undermine" the statement by Urdangarin in his testimony on 25 and 26 February.
Therefore, the lawyer asks the judge in the letter, dated Tuesday, identifying witnesses, defendants and documents referred to in the car.
The judge said a day after this request, in a car in dismissing its claim but notes that the car was referring to statements of the accused Miguel and Jose Luis Ballester Zorio and that of Urdangarin, and also documentation relating to the Foundation Sport, Culture and Social Integration, whose advisory board he was president after leaving Duke Nos.
The judge also said that "there is any data that is not incorporated into the cause and is not available" the lawyer, so it responds to "No helplessness has been caused."
{ 0 comments... read them below or add one }
Post a Comment